PikachuCosmic Eclipse · #241/236 · Rare Secret · 2019
“Its nature is to store up electricity. Forests where nests of Pikachu live are dangerous, since the trees are so often struck by lightning.”— art by Hitoshi Ariga
The Hoshino Verdict
What this card’s market is actually doing — scored, stated and kept current.
Hoshino recorded 411 confirmed sales of this card in the last 12 months across 5 venues in Southeast Asia and North America. The market price is up 187% over the year, down 2% over 90 days and up 7% over 30 days. The most recent sale we hold is 2 days old.
Why is it expensive? It prices in the top 2% of the catalogue because it is a rare secret from Cosmic Eclipse (2019) and the market has moved up 187% over the last year on 411 recorded sales.
Verdict recomputed 10m ago · it changes as the market does.
Pikachu is card 241 in Cosmic Eclipse, released in 2019 as part of the Sun & Moon series. It is a Rare Secret card, illustrated by Hitoshi Ariga.
We hold population readings for this card from PSA, but our own confirmed sale record exceeds them at one or more tiers — so the readings are incomplete and no scarcity figure is quoted here. The counts, and the contradiction, are set out in the population section below. We hold 373 confirmed sales on record for this card across 9 venues in 2 regions — every price on this page traces back to them.
Descriptive market data, not investment advice. The Hoshino Score measures how deep, liquid, widely-traded, dear and scarce this card’s market is from sales and population records we hold. It is not a forecast, not a recommendation, and not a rating of this card as an investment.
Price by grade
What each grade’s real sales say — median of what actually sold.
Each grade is priced on the median of its own real sales — never averaged across grades, and never across printings. A 1st Edition, Shadowless or No Rarity copy is a different market from the ordinary print, so it gets its own row; where a grade holds sales of more than one printing and we cannot tell which copy sold, it is shown without a price — we abstain rather than publish the blend.
| Tier | Price | Confidence | Liquidity | Basis | Obs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw (ungraded) | $162 | High4 of 5 confidence checks passed | 39 in 90d recorded | 70 sales · last recorded 2d ago | 70 |
| BGS 8 | — | — | 1 in 90d | 1 sale · single sale · pop 24 | 1 |
| BGS 9 | $225 | Thin3 of 5 confidence checks passed | 1 in 90d | 3 sales · last 1mo ago · pop 274 | 3 |
| BGS 9.5 | — | — | none in 90d | 1 sale · single sale · pop 208 | 1 |
| CGC 7 | — | — | 1 in 90d | 1 sale · single sale · pop 23 | 1 |
| CGC 9 | $233 | High4 of 5 confidence checks passed | 6 in 90d recorded | 12 sales · last recorded 8d ago · pop 1311 | 12 |
| CGC 10 | $500 | High4 of 5 confidence checks passed | 4 in 90d | 10 sales · last 4d ago · ceiling $750 · 1 sale, unconfirmed · pop 427 | 10 |
| PSA 5 | — | — | 1 in 90d | 2 sales · inverts ladder · pop 124 | 2 |
| PSA 6 | — | — | 1 in 90d | 5 sales · $19–$183 · mixed? · pop 277 | 5 |
| PSA 7 | $188 | High4 of 5 confidence checks passed | 5 in 90d | 6 sales · last 5d ago · pop 669 | 6 |
| PSA 8 | $200 | High4 of 5 confidence checks passed | 32 in 90d recorded | 63 sales · last 5d ago · ceiling $489 · 2 sales, unconfirmed · pop 2902 | 63 |
| PSA 9 | $295 | High4 of 5 confidence checks passed | 97 in 90d recorded | 176 sales · last 6d ago · ceiling $2,000 · 6 sales, unconfirmed · pop 60 | 176 |
| PSA 10 | $2,055 | High4 of 5 confidence checks passed | 50 in 90d recorded | 75 sales · last 7d ago · pop 3780 | 75 |
| SGC 8 | $163 | Thin3 of 5 confidence checks passed | 2 in 90d recorded | 2 sales · last recorded 8d ago · pop 6 | 2 |
| TAG 9 | — | — | 1 in 90d recorded | 1 sale · single sale | 1 |
How confident are we in each of these prices?
There is no weighting and no hidden formula here. We ask five plain questions about the sales behind a price, and the rating is simply how many of them we can answer yes to. Every threshold is the one our pricing engine already uses to decide whether it trusts its own answer — none was invented for this rating. A grade we publish no price for gets no rating either: there would be nothing to rate.
- ✓Enough sales to have a middle — 60 confirmed sales at this exact grade (the observation count beside this rung also includes 3 rows reconstructed from a listing’s own lifecycle rather than a confirmed sale — those never count toward this check)
- ✓Those sales agree with each other — The middle half of them spread 27% around the median
- ✓The market traded it recently — Most recent sale 8 days ago
- ✓More than one marketplace — Sales came from 5 different marketplaces
- ✗Dated by the venue, not by us — 34 of 60 came from venues that publish no sale date, so those dates are the day we recorded the sale — an upper bound on when it actually traded
- ✗Enough sales to have a middle — 3 confirmed sales at this exact grade — under the 5 our pricing engine treats as a settled sample
- ✓Those sales agree with each other — The middle half of them spread 28% around the median
- ✓The market traded it recently — Most recent sale 39 days ago
- ✗More than one marketplace — Every sale came from the same marketplace, so this is one venue’s price rather than the market’s
- ✓Dated by the venue, not by us — Every sale carries a date its venue published
- ✓Enough sales to have a middle — 12 confirmed sales at this exact grade
- ✓Those sales agree with each other — The middle half of them spread 35% around the median
- ✓The market traded it recently — Most recent sale 8 days ago
- ✓More than one marketplace — Sales came from 2 different marketplaces
- ✗Dated by the venue, not by us — 1 of 12 came from venues that publish no sale date, so those dates are the day we recorded the sale — an upper bound on when it actually traded
- ✓Enough sales to have a middle — 10 confirmed sales at this exact grade
- ✓Those sales agree with each other — The middle half of them spread 11% around the median
- ✓The market traded it recently — Most recent sale 4 days ago
- ✗More than one marketplace — Every sale came from the same marketplace, so this is one venue’s price rather than the market’s
- ✓Dated by the venue, not by us — Every sale carries a date its venue published
- ✓Enough sales to have a middle — 6 confirmed sales at this exact grade
- ✓Those sales agree with each other — The middle half of them spread 6% around the median
- ✓The market traded it recently — Most recent sale 5 days ago
- ✗More than one marketplace — Every sale came from the same marketplace, so this is one venue’s price rather than the market’s
- ✓Dated by the venue, not by us — Every sale carries a date its venue published
- ✓Enough sales to have a middle — 63 confirmed sales at this exact grade
- ✓Those sales agree with each other — The middle half of them spread 25% around the median
- ✓The market traded it recently — Most recent sale 5 days ago
- ✓More than one marketplace — Sales came from 2 different marketplaces
- ✗Dated by the venue, not by us — 3 of 63 came from venues that publish no sale date, so those dates are the day we recorded the sale — an upper bound on when it actually traded
- ✓Enough sales to have a middle — 173 confirmed sales at this exact grade
- ✓Those sales agree with each other — The middle half of them spread 20% around the median
- ✓The market traded it recently — Most recent sale 6 days ago
- ✓More than one marketplace — Sales came from 6 different marketplaces
- ✗Dated by the venue, not by us — 18 of 173 came from venues that publish no sale date, so those dates are the day we recorded the sale — an upper bound on when it actually traded
- ✓Enough sales to have a middle — 74 confirmed sales at this exact grade
- ✓Those sales agree with each other — The middle half of them spread 15% around the median
- ✓The market traded it recently — Most recent sale 7 days ago
- ✓More than one marketplace — Sales came from 5 different marketplaces
- ✗Dated by the venue, not by us — 7 of 74 came from venues that publish no sale date, so those dates are the day we recorded the sale — an upper bound on when it actually traded
- ✗Enough sales to have a middle — 2 confirmed sales at this exact grade — under the 5 our pricing engine treats as a settled sample
- ✓Those sales agree with each other — The middle half of them spread 5% around the median
- ✓The market traded it recently — Most recent sale 8 days ago
- ✓More than one marketplace — Sales came from 2 different marketplaces
- ✗Dated by the venue, not by us — 1 of 2 came from venues that publish no sale date, so those dates are the day we recorded the sale — an upper bound on when it actually traded
Where a rung reads last recorded, its most recent sale came from a venue that publishes no sale date — Mercari Japan publishes none — so that date is the day we recorded the sale, an upper bound on when it sold. The price is real; the date is an observation and we will not dress it up as a timestamp.
Cross-market comparisons and arbitrage routes are computed within one grade — PSA 10 against PSA 10, raw against raw. A route is never built from two different grades.
The same card in a different holder
What the market pays for this card at the same grade in each grader’s slab — and, if you hold one, what cracking it would have to return to be worth the fee.
Each grader’s price below is the median of that grader’s own recorded sales of this card at this exact grade. Nothing is averaged across graders and nothing is interpolated from a neighbouring grade. Every price here is the same figure the price-by-grade table above publishes — a rung that table abstains on is abstained on here too, and every fee, freight and tax figure is a real published rate from our cost model.
SGC 8 vs PSA 8
| SGC 8 | PSA 8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price — median of its own recorded sales | $162.50 | $200 |
| Confirmed sales behind it | 2 | 63 |
| Where those sales happened | 🇺🇸 eBay (US) ×1, 🌐 PokéPriceTracker ×1 | 🌐 PokéPriceTracker ×57, 🇺🇸 eBay (US) ×6 |
| Selling fee there | eBay · 13.25% = $21.93 | eBay · 13.25% = $26.90 |
| Net to you after that fee | $140.57 | $173.10 |
The same card at the same grade is worth $32.53 more net in PSA 8’s holder (23%). Both graders’ slabs of this card trade in the same market, so there is no freight or import tax between them — we price the corridor from where the sales actually happened, not from an assumption.
You hold the SGC 8. Crack it and resubmit to PSA?
| What it costs to convert | PSA Regular fee $79.99 + submission shipping $5 | $84.99 |
| Sell the SGC 8 you already own | net on eBay | $140.57 |
| It comes back PSA 8 | net on eBay, less $84.99 | $88.11 |
| It comes back PSA 7 | net on eBay, less $84.99 | $77.48 |
Even a guaranteed PSA 8 does not beat selling the SGC 8 you already hold, once the PSA fee and shipping are paid.
Cracking a slab cannot be undone. The card can be damaged coming out of the holder, and a card that is damaged never gets re-slabbed at all — that outcome is not in the arithmetic above, because we hold no data on how often it happens. Turnaround on this service is 35 business days, during which the price can move. This is information, not advice.
TAG 9 vs PSA 9
We can price a TAG slab because TAG slabs sell in public and we record those sales. We cannot tell you your chance of getting a 10 from TAG: that needs population data — how many of each grade TAG has issued for this card — and we hold none. TAG publishes no population report of the kind PSA, CGC and BGS do. So there is no “submit to TAG” route on this page, and we will not model one.
CGC 9 vs PSA 9
Price trend
Median market price over time, plus the sale-by-sale receipts.
Each point is a real recorded sale at that grade, over the full time we hold. Grades trade at very different prices, so the trend is per grade — pick a grade above.
Daily snapshot medians · US market · raw bucket. — the broader raw market-price trend across the same period, alongside the graded sales above.
PSA 10 population has grown from 24 on 2026-09-11 to 3,780 on 2026-09-19 (+3,756) — real grading-population readings, not a price.
Recent sales
| Sold | Venue | Region | Grade | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-16 4d ago | 🇺🇸 eBay (US) via PokéPriceTracker | North America | CGC 10 | $500 | auction view ↗ |
| 2026-09-15 5d ago | 🇺🇸 eBay (US) via PokéPriceTracker | North America | PSA 8 | $200 | auction view ↗ |
| 2026-09-15 5d ago | 🇺🇸 eBay (US) via PokéPriceTracker | North America | PSA 5 | $161 | auction view ↗ |
| 2026-09-15 5d ago | 🇺🇸 eBay (US) via PokéPriceTracker | North America | PSA 7 | $183 | auction view ↗ |
The 4 most recent — confirmed sales first, then estimates; distinct price points, identical re-ingested rows count once, never stacked. The full 386-point sale-by-sale history unlocks with Pro. Venue is the marketplace the sale actually cleared on — eBay, Goldin, ALT, Fanatics, SNKRDUNK and the rest — established from the sale’s own listing URL, its auction house, or the feed’s own declaration of the venue. A via tag names the data feed that delivered the record; the feed is never the venue. Where none of those establish a marketplace the row says venue not disclosed rather than naming one we cannot prove. Rows tagged guide are marketplace price-guide points (TCGplayer market / Cardmarket trend), not confirmed sales; rows tagged est. are inferred from a listing that left the market, not directly-recorded sales. Rows tagged recorded come from a venue that publishes no sale date — Mercari Japan publishes none — so the date shown is the day we recorded the sale, an upper bound on when it sold. The price is real either way; we do not invent a date.
We hold 59 sales of this card that are not allowed to price anything. Every figure on this page was computed with them removed. See what we set aside for this card, and why →
See the 30-day, 90-day and 1-year charts and every past sale on record — date, venue, region, grade and the price it actually fetched.
Buy from around the world
The lowest live ask on every platform we track — cheapest first.
The cheapest live ask in every region we track — real global pricing, not just the US.
See every listing we track and the net spread — cheapest ask first, the difference after ~13% marketplace + payment fees.
Asks are what sellers want; the price above is what the market actually clears at. Pro shows both sides plus the spread net of fees.
Sold around the world
Daily market prices by region and platform — what this card actually changes hands for worldwide, kept apart from seller asks.
| Platform | Sales | Median | Low – High | Last sold |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🌐 PokéPriceTracker | 26 | $153 | $75 – $225 | $156 10d ago |
| 🇺🇸 eBay (US) | 21 | $175 | $45 – $213 | $75 8d ago recorded |
| 🇬🇧 eBay UK | 7 | $149 | $103 – $172 | £110 · $149 8d ago recorded |
| 🇦🇺 eBay AU | 5 | $183 | $150 – $184 | A$256.93 · $184 8d ago recorded |
| 🇨🇦 eBay CA | 1 | $163 | $163 – $163 | C$225 · $163 8d ago recorded |
Daily market prices across 5 platforms in North America, Europe, Other — counts are distinct sales, never duplicated listings. Guide rows (TCGplayer market / Cardmarket trend) are labelled as estimates, not sales. A recorded tag means that venue publishes no sale date, so its date is the day we saw the listing sold.
When this card goes under the hammer
Results from the consignment houses where high-end copies actually trade — each lot, dated, named, never averaged.
| Sold | House | Tier | Price realised | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-31 | Goldin | PSA 10 | $1,901price realised | lot ↗ |
The top result above is 0.9× our published marketplace median for the same rung (PSA 10 · $2,055). That is not a contradiction and neither figure is wrong: a median describes where copies routinely change hands, and an auction record describes what one specific lot fetched on one specific day in front of bidders who wanted it. We publish both and blend neither.
These are individual consignment-auction results, each one lot on one date at one house — they are listed, never averaged. Two auction results do not make a median: the lots differ in eye appeal, provenance and who was bidding that night. Nothing in this table prices any rung of the grade ladder above, and nothing here moves this card’s market value. Where we hold the hammer price and the buyer’s premium as separate figures we show both, because what the bidder paid and what the consignor was sold at are different facts; where we hold one figure we name which one it is rather than reconstructing the other.
Population reports
How many graded copies exist — with the readings our own sales contradict called out, not quietly used.
⚠︎ These population readings are incomplete, and we will not price scarcity off them
A population report counts every copy a grader has ever slabbed, over the card’s whole life. Our sale record covers a much shorter window. So when our confirmed-sale count for one tier comes out above that grader’s all-time count for the same tier, the two datasets contradict each other and the population reading is the one that is short — here by 134 on PSA 9.
- PSA 9 — the report lists 60 copies, and we hold 194 confirmed sales of that exact tier.
The numbers stay on screen because they are real readings and deleting them would hide the problem. What we have withdrawn is everything derived from them for PSA: no gem rate, no “only N copies exist”, and nothing in this page’s FAQ or structured data. We would rather answer nothing than answer that.
Only confirmed sales are counted in this check — never price-guide rows and never sales we inferred from a listing leaving the market. No competitor runs this check, because none of them holds an independent sale record deep enough to test a population report against.
PSA incomplete reading
| Grade | Population |
|---|---|
| PSA 10 | 3,780 |
| PSA 9 | 60incomplete |
| PSA 8 | 2,902 |
| PSA 7 | 669 |
| PSA 6 | 277 |
| PSA 5 | 124 |
| PSA 4 | 55 |
| PSA 3 | 17 |
| PSA 2 | 1 |
| PSA 1 | 9 |
CGC 2,040 graded copies
| Grade | Population |
|---|---|
| CGC 10 | 427 |
| CGC 9.5 | 92 |
| CGC 9 | 1,311 |
| CGC 8 | 164 |
| CGC 7 | 23 |
| CGC 6 | 15 |
| CGC 5 | 4 |
| CGC 4 | 2 |
| CGC 3 | 1 |
| CGC 2 | 1 |
BGS 509 graded copies
| Grade | Population |
|---|---|
| BGS 9.5 | 208 |
| BGS 9 | 274 |
| BGS 8 | 24 |
| BGS 7 | 3 |
BGS BL 8 graded copies
| Grade | Population |
|---|---|
| BGS BL 10 | 8 |
SGC 160 graded copies
| Grade | Population |
|---|---|
| SGC 10 | 54 |
| SGC 9.5 | 55 |
| SGC 9 | 36 |
| SGC 8 | 6 |
| SGC 7 | 4 |
| SGC 6 | 3 |
| SGC 5 | 1 |
| SGC 2 | 1 |
Population over time — 45 new copies slabbed across 6 tiers in this window
| Tier | Trend | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-19 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSA 10 | 3,777 | 3,780 | +3 (0.1%) | |
| PSA 8 | 2,877 | 2,902 | +25 (0.9%) | |
| CGC 9 | 1,306 | 1,311 | +5 (0.4%) | |
| PSA 7 | 664 | 669 | +5 (0.8%) | |
| CGC 10 | 425 | 427 | +2 (0.5%) | |
| PSA 6 | 272 | 277 | +5 (1.8%) | |
| BGS 9 | 274 | 274 | no change | |
| BGS 9.5 | 208 | 208 | no change |
Every point is a real population reading taken on the date shown — first reading 2026-09-16, latest 2026-09-19 (3 days). That is the whole window we hold for this card; it is not a one-year trend and we will not present it as one. A population can only grow — a card cannot be un-graded — so where a reading came back lower than the one before it, that is a partial crawl and the series carries the higher figure forward rather than drawing a fall that never happened.
Why this matters: scarcity is a flow, not a constant. A tier whose count is climbing is getting less scarce while its price chart says nothing at all — and a tier that has not moved in weeks is holding its scarcity. Nobody else publishes this per grade.
What grading this card would actually cost you
Every term in the sum, sourced — the slab’s real sale price, the marketplace’s published fee, the grader’s published rate.
Every graded row is that same sale, minus the same marketplace fee, minus the grader’s published fee, minus $12 of shipping both ways. The “vs raw” column is the only number that matters: what that outcome would leave you with over selling the card as it is now.
PSA · cheapest published service tier whose declared-value cap covers each outcome
| If it grades | Sells for | eBay fee | Grading | You net | vs raw | Of existing slabs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSA 10 · 75 sales | $2,055 | −$273 | −$149PSA Express · 10d | $1,621 | +$1,473 | — |
| PSA 9 · 176 sales | $295 | −$39 | −$80PSA Regular · 35d | $164 | +$15 | — |
| PSA 8 · 63 sales | $200 | −$27 | −$80PSA Regular · 35d | $81 | −$67 | — |
The “of existing slabs” column is blank for PSA on this card. Its population reading is contradicted by our own sale record (see the population section), and a share worked out from a count we have called incomplete would be a fabricated probability.
CGC · cheapest published service tier whose declared-value cap covers each outcome
| If it grades | Sells for | eBay fee | Grading | You net | vs raw | Of existing slabs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGC 10 · 10 sales | $500 | −$67 | −$35CGC Standard · 25d | $386 | +$238 | 21% |
| CGC 9 · 12 sales | $233 | −$31 | −$35CGC Standard · 25d | $154 | +$6.02 | 64% |
“Of existing slabs” is how CGC’s 2,040 graded copies of this card actually landed. It is the base rate for the population, not the odds for your copy — the copies people submit are not a random sample, and we have never seen the card in your hand.
BGS · cheapest published service tier whose declared-value cap covers each outcome
| If it grades | Sells for | eBay fee | Grading | You net | vs raw | Of existing slabs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGS 9 · 3 sales | $225 | −$30 | −$18BGS Base · 75d | $165 | +$17 | 54% |
“Of existing slabs” is how BGS’s 509 graded copies of this card actually landed. It is the base rate for the population, not the odds for your copy — the copies people submit are not a random sample, and we have never seen the card in your hand.
SGC · cheapest published service tier whose declared-value cap covers each outcome
| If it grades | Sells for | eBay fee | Grading | You net | vs raw | Of existing slabs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGC 8 · 2 sales | $163 | −$22 | −$30SGC (vintage) · 20d | $99 | −$50 | 3.8% |
“Of existing slabs” is how SGC’s 160 graded copies of this card actually landed. It is the base rate for the population, not the odds for your copy — the copies people submit are not a random sample, and we have never seen the card in your hand.
What this cannot tell you. Which grade your copy would get. That depends on centring, edges, surface and corners on the card in your hand, and we have never seen it — so there is no single headline number here and no “worth it / not worth it” verdict. Each row is one outcome, priced from that tier’s own real sales; a tier we publish no price for stays blank rather than borrowing a figure from the grade next to it. Turnaround is the grader’s published business-day estimate, and the market can move inside it. Descriptive market arithmetic, not investment advice.
Should you grade it?
Expected grade × daily market prices − grading fees = net value, per grader.
See the full grader ladder — chance of a 10, what a 10 and a 9 actually fetch, and the fee, expected value and ROI on every route.
Should you grade it? Every grader route, your cost basis, and Japan vs the West → · or scan a photo of your copy
The same card, in Japan
One artwork trades in two markets under different numbers. Here is the other one.
Who is looking at this card
Demand and supply signals that move before price does.
This is where the attention layer goes: how much YouTube activity this card is getting (demand) against how many copies are listed for sale right now (supply). Rising demand into falling supply is the setup that moves before the price does — the leading indicator this category does not have.
We hold no readings for this card, so there is no number here. The model is built (src/attention); the collector has not run against this database yet, and until it has, an attention score would be something we made up. A blank panel that says so is the honest version of this section.
Long-term outlook
Transparent scenario model from real solds, supply and demand — bands widen with time.
See where this card is projected to be in 10 years — scenario bands, every horizon, and the long-term verdict.
Scenario projection based on demand/supply trends and known catalysts. Not investment advice and not a guarantee of future prices.
What Pikachu actually does
The printed card — its attacks, what they cost, what it is weak to, and whether it is still tournament legal.
Flip a coin. If heads, your opponent’s Active Pokémon is now Paralyzed.
This Pokémon does 10 damage to itself.
Its nature is to store up electricity. Forests where nests of Pikachu live are dangerous, since the trees are so often struck by lightning.
Card text, attacks and format legality come from the open card catalogues pokemontcg.io and TCGdex. They describe the card as printed; nothing here is a price, an estimate or anything Hoshino computed. A field we hold no record for is left out rather than filled in.
More from Cosmic Eclipse
Same set, same shelf.
Frequently asked questions
Answered from the data on this page — nothing here is written by hand.
How much is Pikachu (Cosmic Eclipse #241) worth?
Pikachu (Cosmic Eclipse #241) is worth $171 based on daily market prices (65 distinct sales) on Hoshino. Typical range: $137–$201 (raw/ungraded).
Where can I buy or sell Pikachu (Cosmic Eclipse #241)?
You can find Pikachu (Cosmic Eclipse #241) on Hoshino, with live listings on eBay (US), eBay CA, eBay AU, eBay UK and recent solds from PokéPriceTracker, eBay (US), eBay UK, eBay AU. Each listing links directly to the seller’s page.
What is the graded value of Pikachu (Cosmic Eclipse #241)?
Graded values for Pikachu (Cosmic Eclipse #241): BGS 9 — $225; CGC 9 — $233; CGC 10 — $500; PSA 7 — $188; PSA 8 — $200; PSA 9 — $295; PSA 10 — $2,055; SGC 8 — $163. Each tier is priced on its own sales — Hoshino never mixes a PSA 10 with a raw copy.
Is Pikachu (Cosmic Eclipse #241) going up or down in price?
Pikachu (Cosmic Eclipse #241) is trending up in price. 30-day change: +7%. 1-year change: +187%. Based on live market data tracked on Hoshino.
How many Pikachu (Cosmic Eclipse #241) have been graded?
Across CGC and BGS and BGS BL and SGC, 2,717 copies of Pikachu (Cosmic Eclipse #241) have been professionally graded, based on population reports tracked on Hoshino.
What does Pikachu (Cosmic Eclipse #241) do?
Pikachu (Cosmic Eclipse #241) is a 70 HP Lightning-type card (Basic). Its attacks are Nuzzle, Volt Tackle (70 damage). It is weak to Fighting (×2). Illustrated by Hitoshi Ariga.
📛 Get the price badge
Embeddable price badges for Pikachu — pick the look, copy, paste. Live global data no US-only rival can show.
Drop any of these into a listing, blog or forum signature. Each shows the live number with its honest basis — real market price with sale-count provenance, or a clearly labelled guide estimate — and updates as new sales land (cached 1 hour). Add ?theme=light for light backgrounds.
Track Pikachu in your portfolio — free
Live value across every market we track, grade-EV on your exact copy, and alerts the second the price moves.