Garchomp C LV.XSupreme Victors · #145/147 · Rare Holo LV.X · 2009
The Hoshino Verdict
What this card’s market is actually doing — scored, stated and kept current.
Hoshino recorded 54 confirmed sales of this card in the last 12 months across 2 venues. The market price is up 125% over the year, up 30% over 90 days and flat over 30 days. The most recent sale we hold is 2 days old.
Verdict recomputed 12m ago · it changes as the market does.
Garchomp C LV.X is card 145 of 147 in Supreme Victors, released in 2009 as part of the Platinum series. It is a Rare Holo LV.X card, illustrated by Shizurow.
PSA reports 1,143 graded copies, 43 of them Gem Mint 10 (BGS 25 further). We hold 61 confirmed sales on record for this card across 2 venues — every price on this page traces back to them.
Descriptive market data, not investment advice. The Hoshino Score measures how deep, liquid, widely-traded, dear and scarce this card’s market is from sales and population records we hold. It is not a forecast, not a recommendation, and not a rating of this card as an investment.
Price by grade
What each grade’s real sales say — median of what actually sold.
Each grade is priced on the median of its own real sales — never averaged across grades, and never across printings. A 1st Edition, Shadowless or No Rarity copy is a different market from the ordinary print, so it gets its own row; where a grade holds sales of more than one printing and we cannot tell which copy sold, it is shown without a price — we abstain rather than publish the blend.
| Tier | Price | Confidence | Liquidity | Basis | Obs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw (ungraded) | $19.99 | High4 of 5 confidence checks passed | 1 in 90d | 5 sales · last 2d ago | 5 |
| BGS 9 | — | — | none in 90d | 1 sale · single sale · pop 17 | 1 |
| CGC 7 | $83.38 | Thin2 of 5 confidence checks passed | 1 in 90d | 2 sales · last 3mo ago · pop 9 | 2 |
| PSA 1 | $55.31 | Thin2 of 5 confidence checks passed | none in 90d | 2 sales · last 4mo ago · pop 12 | 2 |
| PSA 5 | $59.99 | High4 of 5 confidence checks passed | 2 in 90d | 7 sales · last 3d ago · pop 45 | 7 |
| PSA 6 | — | — | 2 in 90d | 7 sales · inverts ladder · pop 102 | 7 |
| PSA 7 | — | — | 6 in 90d | 23 sales · inverts ladder · pop 244 | 23 |
| PSA 8 | — | — | none in 90d | 23 sales · inverts ladder · pop 386 | 23 |
| PSA 9 | $127 | — | — | modeled est. est. from PSA 8 × 1.15 · pop 287 | |
| PSA 10 | $145 | — | — | modeled est. est. from PSA 8 × 1.15 · pop 43 |
How confident are we in each of these prices?
There is no weighting and no hidden formula here. We ask five plain questions about the sales behind a price, and the rating is simply how many of them we can answer yes to. Every threshold is the one our pricing engine already uses to decide whether it trusts its own answer — none was invented for this rating. A grade we publish no price for gets no rating either: there would be nothing to rate.
- ✓Enough sales to have a middle — 5 confirmed sales at this exact grade
- ✓Those sales agree with each other — The middle half of them spread 0% around the median
- ✓The market traded it recently — Most recent sale 2 days ago
- ✗More than one marketplace — Every sale came from the same marketplace, so this is one venue’s price rather than the market’s
- ✓Dated by the venue, not by us — Every sale carries a date its venue published
- ✗Enough sales to have a middle — 2 confirmed sales at this exact grade — under the 5 our pricing engine treats as a settled sample
- ✓Those sales agree with each other — The middle half of them spread 8% around the median
- ✗The market traded it recently — Most recent sale 84 days ago — past the 45-day half-life at which our engine already halves a sale’s weight
- ✗More than one marketplace — Every sale came from the same marketplace, so this is one venue’s price rather than the market’s
- ✓Dated by the venue, not by us — Every sale carries a date its venue published
- ✗Enough sales to have a middle — 2 confirmed sales at this exact grade — under the 5 our pricing engine treats as a settled sample
- ✓Those sales agree with each other — The middle half of them spread 45% around the median
- ✗The market traded it recently — Most recent sale 105 days ago — past the 45-day half-life at which our engine already halves a sale’s weight
- ✗More than one marketplace — Every sale came from the same marketplace, so this is one venue’s price rather than the market’s
- ✓Dated by the venue, not by us — Every sale carries a date its venue published
- ✓Enough sales to have a middle — 5 confirmed sales at this exact grade
- ✓Those sales agree with each other — The middle half of them spread 49% around the median
- ✓The market traded it recently — Most recent sale 3 days ago
- ✗More than one marketplace — Every sale came from the same marketplace, so this is one venue’s price rather than the market’s
- ✓Dated by the venue, not by us — Every sale carries a date its venue published
Cross-market comparisons and arbitrage routes are computed within one grade — PSA 10 against PSA 10, raw against raw. A route is never built from two different grades.
The same card in a different holder
What the market pays for this card at the same grade in each grader’s slab — and, if you hold one, what cracking it would have to return to be worth the fee.
Each grader’s price below is the median of that grader’s own recorded sales of this card at this exact grade. Nothing is averaged across graders and nothing is interpolated from a neighbouring grade. Every price here is the same figure the price-by-grade table above publishes — a rung that table abstains on is abstained on here too, and every fee, freight and tax figure is a real published rate from our cost model.
CGC 8 vs PSA 8
CGC 7 vs PSA 7
BGS 9 vs PSA 9
Price trend
Median market price over time, plus the sale-by-sale receipts.
Each point is a real recorded sale at that grade, over the full time we hold. Grades trade at very different prices, so the trend is per grade — pick a grade above.
Daily snapshot medians · US market · raw bucket. — the broader raw market-price trend across the same period, alongside the graded sales above.
Recent sales
| Sold | Venue | Region | Grade | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-18 2d ago | 🇺🇸 eBay (US) via PokéPriceTracker | North America | NM | $19.99 | view ↗ |
| 2026-09-18 2d ago | 🇺🇸 eBay (US) via PokéPriceTracker | North America | PSA 6 | $115 | view ↗ |
| 2026-09-17 3d ago | 🇺🇸 eBay (US) via PokéPriceTracker | North America | PSA 5 | $105 | view ↗ |
| 2026-08-24 27d ago | 🇺🇸 eBay (US) via PokéPriceTracker | North America | PSA 7 | $135 | auction view ↗ |
The 4 most recent — confirmed sales first, then estimates; distinct price points, identical re-ingested rows count once, never stacked. The full 66-point sale-by-sale history unlocks with Pro. Venue is the marketplace the sale actually cleared on — eBay, Goldin, ALT, Fanatics, SNKRDUNK and the rest — established from the sale’s own listing URL, its auction house, or the feed’s own declaration of the venue. A via tag names the data feed that delivered the record; the feed is never the venue. Where none of those establish a marketplace the row says venue not disclosed rather than naming one we cannot prove. Rows tagged guide are marketplace price-guide points (TCGplayer market / Cardmarket trend), not confirmed sales; rows tagged est. are inferred from a listing that left the market, not directly-recorded sales. Rows tagged recorded come from a venue that publishes no sale date — Mercari Japan publishes none — so the date shown is the day we recorded the sale, an upper bound on when it sold. The price is real either way; we do not invent a date.
We hold 145 sales of this card that are not allowed to price anything. Every figure on this page was computed with them removed. See what we set aside for this card, and why →
See the 30-day, 90-day and 1-year charts and every past sale on record — date, venue, region, grade and the price it actually fetched.
Buy from around the world
The lowest live ask on every platform we track — cheapest first.
The cheapest live ask in every region we track — real global pricing, not just the US.
See every listing we track and the net spread — cheapest ask first, the difference after ~13% marketplace + payment fees.
Asks are what sellers want; the price above is what the market actually clears at. Pro shows both sides plus the spread net of fees.
Sold around the world
Daily market prices by region and platform — what this card actually changes hands for worldwide, kept apart from seller asks.
| Platform | Sales | Median | Low – High | Last sold |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🌐 PokéPriceTracker | 5 | $19.99 | $12.50 – $21.50 | $19.99 2d ago |
Daily market prices across 1 platform in North America — counts are distinct sales, never duplicated listings. Guide rows (TCGplayer market / Cardmarket trend) are labelled as estimates, not sales.
When this card goes under the hammer
Results from the consignment houses where high-end copies actually trade — each lot, dated, named, never averaged.
| Sold | House | Tier | Price realised | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-13 | Fanatics Collect | PSA 10 | $24,600price realised | lot ↗ |
| 2026-06-22 | Fanatics Collect | PSA 10 | $21,000price realised | lot ↗ |
These are individual consignment-auction results, each one lot on one date at one house — they are listed, never averaged. Two auction results do not make a median: the lots differ in eye appeal, provenance and who was bidding that night. Nothing in this table prices any rung of the grade ladder above, and nothing here moves this card’s market value. Where we hold the hammer price and the buyer’s premium as separate figures we show both, because what the bidder paid and what the consignor was sold at are different facts; where we hold one figure we name which one it is rather than reconstructing the other.
Population reports
How many graded copies exist — with the readings our own sales contradict called out, not quietly used.
⚠︎ These population readings are incomplete, and we will not price scarcity off them
A population report counts every copy a grader has ever slabbed, over the card’s whole life. Our sale record covers a much shorter window. So when our confirmed-sale count for one tier comes out above that grader’s all-time count for the same tier, the two datasets contradict each other and the population reading is the one that is short — here by 4 on CGC 10.
- CGC 10 — the report lists 14 copies, and we hold 18 confirmed sales of that exact tier.
The numbers stay on screen because they are real readings and deleting them would hide the problem. What we have withdrawn is everything derived from them for CGC: no gem rate, no “only N copies exist”, and nothing in this page’s FAQ or structured data. We would rather answer nothing than answer that.
Only confirmed sales are counted in this check — never price-guide rows and never sales we inferred from a listing leaving the market. No competitor runs this check, because none of them holds an independent sale record deep enough to test a population report against.
PSA 1,143 graded copies
| Grade | Population |
|---|---|
| PSA 10 | 43 |
| PSA 9 | 287 |
| PSA 8 | 386 |
| PSA 7 | 244 |
| PSA 6 | 102 |
| PSA 5 | 45 |
| PSA 4 | 12 |
| PSA 3 | 8 |
| PSA 2 | 4 |
| PSA 1 | 12 |
CGC incomplete reading
| Grade | Population |
|---|---|
| CGC 10 | 14incomplete |
| CGC 9.5 | 4 |
| CGC 9 | 32 |
| CGC 8 | 34 |
| CGC 7 | 9 |
| CGC 6 | 5 |
| CGC 5 | 3 |
| CGC 4 | 1 |
BGS 25 graded copies
| Grade | Population |
|---|---|
| BGS 9.5 | 4 |
| BGS 9 | 17 |
| BGS 8 | 4 |
SGC 5 graded copies
| Grade | Population |
|---|---|
| SGC 9.5 | 1 |
| SGC 9 | 2 |
| SGC 6 | 1 |
| SGC 1 | 1 |
Population over time — 5 new copies slabbed across 2 tiers in this window
| Tier | Trend | 2026-08-27 | 2026-09-20 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSA 8 | 386 | 386 | no change | |
| PSA 9 | 287 | 287 | no change | |
| PSA 7 | 240 | 244 | +4 (1.7%) | |
| PSA 6 | 101 | 102 | +1 (1.0%) | |
| PSA 5 | 45 | 45 | no change | |
| PSA 10 | 43 | 43 | no change | |
| CGC 8 | 34 | 34 | no change | |
| CGC 9 | 32 | 32 | no change |
Every point is a real population reading taken on the date shown — first reading 2026-08-27, latest 2026-09-20 (24 days). That is the whole window we hold for this card; it is not a one-year trend and we will not present it as one. A population can only grow — a card cannot be un-graded — so where a reading came back lower than the one before it, that is a partial crawl and the series carries the higher figure forward rather than drawing a fall that never happened.
Why this matters: scarcity is a flow, not a constant. A tier whose count is climbing is getting less scarce while its price chart says nothing at all — and a tier that has not moved in weeks is holding its scarcity. Nobody else publishes this per grade.
Should you grade it?
Expected grade × daily market prices − grading fees = net value, per grader.
See the full grader ladder — chance of a 10, what a 10 and a 9 actually fetch, and the fee, expected value and ROI on every route.
Should you grade it? Every grader route, your cost basis, and Japan vs the West → · or scan a photo of your copy
Who is looking at this card
Demand and supply signals that move before price does.
This is where the attention layer goes: how much YouTube activity this card is getting (demand) against how many copies are listed for sale right now (supply). Rising demand into falling supply is the setup that moves before the price does — the leading indicator this category does not have.
We hold no readings for this card, so there is no number here. The model is built (src/attention); the collector has not run against this database yet, and until it has, an attention score would be something we made up. A blank panel that says so is the honest version of this section.
Long-term outlook
Transparent scenario model from real solds, supply and demand — bands widen with time.
See where this card is projected to be in 10 years — scenario bands, every horizon, and the long-term verdict.
Scenario projection based on demand/supply trends and known catalysts. Not investment advice and not a guarantee of future prices.
What Garchomp C LV.X actually does
The printed card — its attacks, what they cost, what it is weak to, and whether it is still tournament legal.
Once during your turn (before your attack), when you put Garchomp C LV.X from your hand onto your Active Garchomp C, you may remove all damage counters from each of your Pokémon SP.
Discard 2 Energy attached to Garchomp C. Choose 1 of your opponent's Pokémon. This attack does 80 damage to that Pokémon. (Don't apply Weakness and Resistance for Benched Pokémon.) Garchomp C can't use Dragon Rush during your next turn.
Card text, attacks and format legality come from the open card catalogue TCGdex. They describe the card as printed; nothing here is a price, an estimate or anything Hoshino computed. A field we hold no record for is left out rather than filled in.
More from Supreme Victors
Same set, same shelf.
Frequently asked questions
Answered from the data on this page — nothing here is written by hand.
How much is Garchomp C LV.X (Supreme Victors #145) worth?
Garchomp C LV.X (Supreme Victors #145) is worth $21.40 based on daily market prices (6 distinct sales) on Hoshino. Typical range: $19.99–$26.52 (raw/ungraded).
Where can I buy or sell Garchomp C LV.X (Supreme Victors #145)?
You can find Garchomp C LV.X (Supreme Victors #145) on Hoshino, with live listings on eBay (US), eBay AU, eBay CA, eBay UK and recent solds from PokéPriceTracker. Each listing links directly to the seller’s page.
What is the graded value of Garchomp C LV.X (Supreme Victors #145)?
Graded values for Garchomp C LV.X (Supreme Victors #145): CGC 7 — $83.38; PSA 1 — $55.31; PSA 5 — $59.99. Each tier is priced on its own sales — Hoshino never mixes a PSA 10 with a raw copy.
Is Garchomp C LV.X (Supreme Victors #145) going up or down in price?
Garchomp C LV.X (Supreme Victors #145) is trending up in price. 30-day change: 0%. 1-year change: +125%. Based on live market data tracked on Hoshino.
How many Garchomp C LV.X (Supreme Victors #145) have been graded?
Across PSA and BGS and SGC, 1,173 copies of Garchomp C LV.X (Supreme Victors #145) have been professionally graded, based on population reports tracked on Hoshino.
What is the PSA 10 population of Garchomp C LV.X (Supreme Victors #145)?
PSA has graded 43 copies of Garchomp C LV.X (Supreme Victors #145) as Gem Mint 10, according to population reports tracked on Hoshino.
What does Garchomp C LV.X (Supreme Victors #145) do?
Garchomp C LV.X (Supreme Victors #145) is a 110 HP Colorless-type card (LEVEL-UP). Its attack is Dragon Rush. It is weak to Colorless (x2). Illustrated by Shizurow.
📛 Get the price badge
Embeddable price badges for Garchomp C LV.X — pick the look, copy, paste. Live global data no US-only rival can show.
Drop any of these into a listing, blog or forum signature. Each shows the live number with its honest basis — real market price with sale-count provenance, or a clearly labelled guide estimate — and updates as new sales land (cached 1 hour). Add ?theme=light for light backgrounds.
Track Garchomp C LV.X in your portfolio — free
Live value across every market we track, grade-EV on your exact copy, and alerts the second the price moves.